Development of Quality of Life model with Emphasis on Landscape Ecology Approach
Keywords:
Quality of life (QOL), landscape ecology, grounded theory, green infrastructure (GI)Abstract
The objective of this study is to design and present a conceptual model of quality of life with an emphasis on landscape ecology and urban ecology approaches. This research adopted a qualitative methodology using grounded theory within an interpretive paradigm. Data collection combined extensive literature review with semi-structured interviews. Twenty participants—including city officials, university professors, and community leaders with expertise in urban ecology and quality of life—were selected through purposive sampling. Interviews, conducted via phone and email due to COVID-19 restrictions, lasted 20–30 minutes each and continued until theoretical saturation was reached. Responses were transcribed and analyzed using Atlas.ti software, following the coding sequence of open, axial, and selective coding. The study sought to identify causal conditions, contextual and intervening conditions, strategies, and consequences for integrating green infrastructure into urban ecology frameworks to improve life quality. The results highlighted the central role of green infrastructure as the main phenomenon influencing urban quality of life. Participants emphasized ecological corridors, green patches, green roofs, and connected ecological networks as crucial components for enhancing social, environmental, and economic well-being. The model demonstrated that causal conditions such as urban expansion pressures, biodiversity loss, and socio-economic challenges necessitate ecological approaches. Intervening conditions included transportation networks, cultural background, and citizen participation, while contextual conditions involved natural and man-made urban elements. Strategies proposed include reforming ecological structures, improving ecological knowledge, promoting sustainable land-use planning, and strengthening cultural and social infrastructure. The consequences identified include low-impact development, protection of ecosystem services, healthier human-ecological zones, social safety and equality, and the creation of green economic infrastructure with job opportunities. This study presents a comprehensive conceptual model that integrates quality of life indicators with urban ecology principles through green infrastructure. By recognizing ecological knowledge, cultural values, and structural planning, the model provides a pathway toward eco-centered social and economic development, sustainability, and enhanced human well-being in cities.
Downloads
References
1. Popescu AI. Long-Term City Innovation Trajectories and Quality of Urban Life. Sustainability. 2020;12(24):10587. doi: 10.3390/su122410587.
2. Papachristou AI, Rosas-casals M. Cities and quality of life. Quantitative modeling of the emergence of the happiness field in urban studies. Cities. 2019;88:191-208. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2018.10.012.
3. Al-Qawasmi J, Saeed M, Asfour OS, Adel S, Aldosary AS. Assessing Urban Quality of Life: Developing the Criteria for Saudi Cities. Front Built Environ. 2021;7. doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2021.682391.
4. Oecd. Executive summary. 2020. doi: 10.1787/ea714361-en.
5. Wiesli T, Hammer T, Bär R. Sustainable Quality of Life: A Conceptualization That Integrates the Views of Inhabitants of Swiss Rural Regions. Sustainability. 2021;13(16):9187. doi: 10.3390/su13169187.
6. Matsler AM, Meerow S, Mell IC, Pavao-Zuckerman MA. A 'green' chameleon: Exploring the many disciplinary definitions, goals and forms of "green infrastructure". Landscape and Urban Planning. 2021;214:104145. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104145.
7. Grimm NB, Pickett STA, Hale RL, Cadenasso ML. Does the ecological concept of disturbance have utility in urban social-ecological-technological systems? Ecosystem Health and Sustainability. 2017;3(1):1-18. doi: 10.1002/ehs2.1255.
8. Ferreira J, Monteiro R, Silva V. Planning a Green Infrastructure Network from Theory to Practice: The Case Study of Setúbal, Portugal. Sustainability. 2021;13(15):8432. doi: 10.3390/su13158432.
9. Hsu KW, Chao JC. Study on the Value Model of Urban Green Infrastructure Development: A Case Study of the Central District of Taichung City. Sustainability. 2021;13(13):7402. doi: 10.3390/su13137402.
10. Lin Z. Ecological urbanism in East Asia: A comparative assessment of two eco-cities in Japan and China. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2018;179:90-102. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.07.008.
11. Kitheka BM, Baldwin E, Powell R. Grey to green: Tracing the path to environmental transformation and regeneration of a major industrial city. Cities. 2021;108:102987. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102987.
12. Hassanpour P, Sayyahnia R, Hassan Esmaeilzadeh H. Ecological structure assessment of urban green space using the landscape approach (case study: Tehran's 22nd district). Environmental Sciences. 2020;18(1):187-202. doi: 10.29252/envs.18.1.187.
13. Monteiro R, Ferreira J, Antunes P. Green Infrastructure Planning Principles: An Integrated Literature Review. Land. 2020;9(12):525. doi: 10.3390/land9120525.
14. Grabowska I. Quality of Life in Poor Neighborhoods through the Lenses of the Capability Approach: A Case Study of a Deprived Area of Łódź City Centre. Sustainability. 2021;13:7185. doi: 10.3390/su13137185.
15. Zahrah W, Ginting N, Aulia DN, Marisa A. Quality of life for livable mixed use living. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021;780(1):012043. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/780/1/012043.
16. Williams MO, Whitmarsh L, Haddock G, Chríost DMG. A Grounded Theory of Pro-Nature Behavior: From Moral Concern to Sustained Action. Sustainability. 2021;13(16):8944. doi: 10.3390/su13168944.
17. Perelman NL, Kolosov VP. Differences in the health-related quality of life in patients with asthma living in urban and rural areas in the Amur Region of Russian Federation. PloS one. 2023;18(11):e0284683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284683.
18. Mallick A. Unravelling the Role of Health-Promoting and Health-Abusive Lifestyle Behaviours on Health-Related Quality of Life Among the Urban Community-Dwelling Youths: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Balasore District of Odisha, India. 2025. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6087073/v1.
19. Akinwale OE, Kuye OL, Doddanavar I. Scourge of replacing contemporary work environment with artificial intelligence (AI-dark-side): the role of capacity development in quality of work-life and organisational performance. Journal of Systems and Information Technology. 2025;27(1):116-45. doi: 10.1108/JSIT-08-2024-0297.
20. Fang W, An H, Li H, Gao X, Sun X. Urban economy development and ecological carrying capacity: Taking Beijing city as the case. Energy Procedia. 2017;105:3493-8. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.801.
21. Bilgaev A, Dong S, Li F, Cheng H, Sadykova E, Mikheeva A. Assessment of the Current Eco-Socio-Economic Situation of the Baikal Region (Russia) from the Perspective of the Green Economy Development. Sustainability. 2020;12(9):3767. doi: 10.3390/su12093767.
22. Goerlich F, Reig E. Quality of life ranking of Spanish cities: A non-compensatory approach. Cities. 2021;109:102979. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102979.
23. Kumakoshi Y, Chan SY, Koizumi H, Li X, Yoshimura Y. Standardized Green View Index and Quantification of Different Metrics of Urban Green Vegetation. Sustainability. 2020;12(18):7434. doi: 10.3390/su12187434.
24. Muro RST, Granados S, Romero ER. Green Infrastructures in the Peri-Urban Landscape: Exploring Local Perception of Well-Being through 'Go-Alongs' and 'Semi-Structured Interviews'. Sustainability. 2020;12(17):6836. doi: 10.3390/su12176836.
25. Muro RST, Granados CST, Romero EJR. Green Infrastructures in the Peri-Urban Landscape: Exploring Local Perception of Well-Being through 'Go-Alongs' and 'Semi-Structured Interviews'. Sustainability. 2021;12(17):6836. doi: 10.3390/su12176836.
26. Fluhrer T, Chapa F, Hack J. A Methodology for Assessing the Implementation Potential for Retrofitted and Multifunctional Urban Green Infrastructure in Public Areas of the Global South. Sustainability. 2021;13(1):384. doi: 10.3390/su13010384.
27. Nikoofam M, Abdollah Mobaraki A. Assessment of Quality of Life in the Urban Environment; Case Study: Famagusta, N. Cyprus. Civil Engineering and Architecture. 2020;8(5):860-72. doi: 10.13189/cea.2020.080513.
28. Shafiei Sabet N, et al. The Effect of Enhancing Components of Environmental Quality of Life on Sustainable Development in Iran. JSRD. 2020;4(1):71-88. doi: 10.32598/JSRD.03.02.05.
29. Orîndaru A, Constantinescu M, Țuclea CE, Căescu SC, Florescu MS, Dumitru I. Rurbanization-Making the City Greener: Young Citizen Implication and Future Actions. Sustainability. 2020;12(17):7175. doi: 10.3390/su12177175.
30. Kaklauska A, Zavadskas EK, Radzeviciene A, Ubarte I, Podviezko A, Podvezko V, et al. Quality of city life multiple criteria analysis. Cities. 2018;72:82-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.002.
31. Apud A, Faggian R, Sposito V, Martino D. Suitability Analysis and Planning of Green Infrastructure in Montevideo, Uruguay. Sustainability. 2020;12(22):9683. doi: 10.3390/su12229683.
32. Pazhuhan M, Zanganeh Shahraki S, Kaveerad N, Cividino S, Clemente M, Salvati L. Factors Underlying Life Quality in Urban Contexts: Evidence from an Industrial City (Arak, Iran). Sustainability. 2020;12(6):2274. doi: 10.3390/su12062274.
33. Faraji Sabokbar HA, Najarzadeh M, Torabi Z, Malakan A. Studying factors affecting quality of life using multilevel models: A case study in rural areas of Kangavar County. Journal of Sustainable Rural Development. 2017;1(1):5-14. doi: 10.18869/nrip.jsrd.1.1.3.
34. Al-Qawasmi J. Selecting a Contextualized Set of Urban Quality of Life Indicators: Results of a Delphi Consensus Procedure. Sustainability. 2021;13(9):4945. doi: 10.3390/su13094945.
35. Vaziri M, Bani Khalifi N, Mofidi Shamirani SM. Examining the Concept of Smart City: Integrating Information Technology to Improve Quality of Life and Urban Services. Quarterly Journal of Modern Architectural Research. 2023;10:45-62.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mahsa Bavili (Author); Hamid Majedi; Zahra Sadat Saeideh Zarabadi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
