Investigating the Mediating Role of Self-Compassion and Cognitive Emotion Regulation in the Relationship Between Experiential Avoidance and Tendency Toward Extramarital Relationships Among Married Women
Keywords:
tendency toward extramarital relationships, self-compassion, cognitive emotion regulation, experiential avoidance, married womenAbstract
The present study was conducted with the aim of examining a causal model of experiential avoidance, self-compassion, cognitive emotion regulation, and the tendency toward extramarital relationships among married women in the city of Shiraz. This research employed a correlational design within the framework of structural equation modeling. The statistical population consisted of all married women residing in Shiraz during the winter of 2025, from whom 250 individuals were selected through convenience sampling. Data were collected using the Whatley Tendency Toward Extramarital Relationships Questionnaire (2008), the Neff Self-Compassion Scale (2003), the Garnefski Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (2001), and the Gámez Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (2001). Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 24 and SmartPLS software. Findings from the model analysis indicated that all direct and indirect paths among the variables were statistically significant, and the model demonstrated an acceptable fit. Accordingly, it can be concluded that experiential avoidance, self-compassion, and cognitive emotion regulation exert significant effects on married women’s tendency toward extramarital relationships.
Downloads
References
1. Rokach A, Chan SH. Love and infidelity: Causes, consequences, and considerations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023;20(3):1055. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031055.
2. Hui QW, Luo Y, Fincham FD. The consequences of spousal infidelity for long-term chronic health: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2024;41(5):1123-42. doi: 10.1177/02654075241276713.
3. Manes E, Impett EA, Muise A, Day LC. Emotion regulation and infidelity: A dyadic perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2022;39(2):347-68. doi: 10.1177/02654075211055047.
4. Haze CM. Emotion regulation in couples across adulthood. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology. 2023;5:145-66. doi: 10.1146/annurev-devpsych-120621-043836.
5. Brzozowski A. Maladaptive emotion regulation strategies mediate the relationship between cognitive emotion regulation and interpersonal outcomes. Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy. 2024;34(1):100485. doi: 10.1016/j.jbct.2024.100485.
6. Rusu PP, Bodenmann G, Kayser K. Cognitive emotion regulation and positive dyadic outcomes in married couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2018;36(1):359-76. doi: 10.1177/0265407517751664.
7. Zamir O. Experiential avoidance, dyadic interaction and relationship outcomes. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. 2017;6(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.02.001.
8. Morissette F, Harvey A, Paradis A, Daspe MÈ, Dion J, Godbout N. Childhood trauma and relationship satisfaction among parents: A dyadic perspective on the role of mindfulness and experiential avoidance. Mindfulness. 2023;14(12):3021-34. doi: 10.1007/s12671-023-02045-z.
9. Kurşuncu MA, Baştemur Ş, Kalkan M. The mediating role of experiential avoidance in the relationship between focus on child and marital satisfaction. Ege Eğitim Dergisi. 2023;24(1):16-28. doi: 10.12984/egeefd.1161512.
10. Holas P, Nogaj A, Mierzejewski P, Stemplewska Ż. The role of self-compassion and experiential avoidance in psychological functioning: A longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology. 2025;16:12026465. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.12026465.
11. Neff KD, Tóth-Király I, Knox MC, Kuchar A, Davidson O. The development and validation of the state self-compassion scale (long- and short-form). Mindfulness. 2023;14(2):291-309. doi: 10.1007/s12671-022-01983-7.
12. Martínez-Rubio D, González-Conde J, Lozano LM, Peñate W. How mindfulness, self-compassion, and experiential avoidance are related to perceived stress in a sample of university students. PLOS ONE. 2023;18(2):e0280791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280791.
13. Lathren CR, Bluth K, Park J. Self-compassion and close interpersonal relationships: A systematic review. Mindfulness. 2021;12(7):1680-96. doi: 10.1007/s12671-021-01631-7.
14. Tandler N. Are self-compassionate partners less jealous? Self and Identity. 2018;17(6):637-52. doi: 10.1080/15298868.2018.1450257.
15. Körner R, Tandler N, Petersen LE, Schütz A. Is caring for oneself relevant to happy relationship functioning? Exploring associations between self-compassion and romantic relationship satisfaction in actors and partners. Personal Relationships. 2024. doi: 10.1111/pere.12535.
16. Körner R. Is caring for oneself relevant to happy relationships? The role of self-compassion in partner relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships. 2024. doi: 10.1111/pere.12535.
17. Sharma R, Mishra S. Compassion on willingness to forgive infidelity in married couples. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology. 2024;15(2):116-22. doi: 10.1007/s12671-021-01631-7.
18. Dawson SJ, Fitzpatrick ET, Farm GHJ, Rosen NO. Self-compassion and compassionate love are positively associated with sexual and relational well-being among expectant and new parent couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2023;52(8):3393-404. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02658-8.
19. Wang T, Xiao Q, Wang H, Hu Y, Xiang J. Self-compassion defuses the aggression triggered by social exclusion. PsyCh Journal. 2024;13(6):1014-25. doi: 10.1002/pchj.774.
20. Li M. The relationship between cognitive emotion regulation strategy and mental health among university students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychology Research and Behavior Management. 2024;17:2581-93. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S454732.
21. Prats C, Dominguez R, Estevez E. Attachment styles, emotion regulation, and infidelity: A dyadic analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2024;41(2):356-75. doi: 10.1177/02654075231199555.
22. Martínez-Rubio D, Díaz-García A, Blanco-Donoso LM. How mindfulness, self-compassion, and experiential avoidance are related to perceived stress. PLOS ONE. 2023;18(2):e0280791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280791.
23. Kocyigit M. Emotion regulation and couple burnout in marriage: The mediating role of marital satisfaction. Current Psychology. 2025. doi: 10.1007/s12144-024-07253-1.
24. Lindert J, Melchiorre MG, Stankunas M, Ibsen T, LoGiudice D. Positive and negative family relationships correlate with mental health conditions in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2025;16:1533125. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1533125.
25. Gopalakrishnan L, Ramkumar A, Velayudhan A. A longitudinal study of the role of spousal relationship quality and mental health in newly married women. Ssm - Mental Health. 2023;3:100016. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2023.100016.
26. Lișman CG, Holman AC. Principled faithfulness: A measure of moral reasons for fidelity and its associations with the tendency to engage in extramarital relationships, moral emotions and emotion regulation. Social Sciences. 2025;14(2):81. doi: 10.3390/socsci14020081.
27. Onaylı S. Emotional reactions to infidelity: Examining the roles of self-compassion, forgiveness, rumination and cognitive appraisal: Middle East Technical University; 2019.
28. McDaniel BT, Drouin M. Marital satisfaction, infidelity behaviors, and technology use in romantic relationships. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 2023;49(1):44-60. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2022.2136955.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hossein Ebrahimi; Ghazale Nowrozidoost (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
