A Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Combined Cognitive–Emotional Reconstruction Package for Infertile Women and Unified Transdiagnostic Couple Therapy on Emotion Regulation and Affective Capital
Keywords:
combined cognitive–emotional reconstruction couple intervention, unified transdiagnostic couple therapy, emotion regulation, affective capital, infertile womenAbstract
Infertility is one of the most stressful and distressing experiences in marital life and can profoundly influence the emotional conditions and relationship quality of couples. The purpose of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of the combined cognitive–emotional reconstruction couple intervention with unified transdiagnostic couple therapy on emotion regulation and affective capital in infertile women. The study employed a quasi-experimental design with pretest–posttest and a two-month follow-up, including a control group. The statistical population consisted of infertile women who sought services at infertility centers in Isfahan during the winter of 2024. From this population, 60 individuals were selected through purposive sampling and randomly assigned to three groups of 20 participants each. The combined cognitive–emotional reconstruction couple treatment and unified transdiagnostic couple therapy were administered over ten 60-minute sessions. The research instruments included the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (Gross & John, 2003) and the Affective Capital Scale (Golparvar, 2018). Data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc tests in SPSS version 26. The results indicated that both therapeutic approaches, when compared with the control group, significantly improved emotion regulation and increased affective capital (p < .01). In comparing the two therapeutic methods, cognitive–emotional reconstruction showed significantly greater effectiveness than unified transdiagnostic couple therapy in the reappraisal component of emotion regulation and in affective capital; however, in the emotional suppression component of emotion regulation, both approaches demonstrated similar levels of effectiveness
Downloads
References
1. Liang Y, Huang J, Zhao Q, Mo H, Su Z, Feng S, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence and trends of infertility among individuals of reproductive age (15–49 years) from 1990 to 2021, with projections to 2040. Human Reproduction. 2025;40(3):529–44. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae292.
2. Taheripanah R, Haghdoost AA, Baneshi MR, Yazdanpanah M, Salehi F, Akbari N, et al. Nationwide prevalence of infertility in Iranian couples: Findings from a 2019 study. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):1963. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22974-z.
3. Wang L, Tang Y, Wang Y. Predictors and incidence of depression and anxiety in women undergoing infertility treatment: A cross-sectional study. PLOS ONE. 2023;18(4):e0284414. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284414.
4. Ye H, Zhao J, Zou Y, Song X, Xu M, Zhang Y, et al. Correlations among hope, fertility quality of life and negative emotions for couples undergoing their first in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: A cross-sectional analysis. Reproductive Health. 2025;22(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-01954-x.
5. Zhai J, Zhao S, Hao G. The impact of sociocultural and psychological stress on the outcome of assisted reproductive technology in remarried families. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2024;45(1):2351809. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2024.2351809.
6. Papathanasiou A. Beyond clinical outcomes: Seven pillars for integrating emotional wellbeing into IVF care and research. Women & Health. 2025;65(6):479–82. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2025.2529507.
7. Kuug AK, Sindiwe J, Sihaam JB. Psychosocial-cultural care for couples experiencing infertility: An integrative review. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences. 2025:100823. doi: 10.1016/j.ijans.2025.100823.
8. Gross JJ. Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry. 2015;26(1):1–26. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781.
9. Gross JJ, John OP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003;85:348–62. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348.
10. Aldao A, Dixon-Gordon K. Emotion regulation in context: Examining the role of cognitive processes. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2019;28:61–6.
11. Galhardo A, Cunha M, Pinto-Gouveia J, Matos M. The mediator role of emotion regulation processes on infertility-related stress. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings. 2013;20(4):497–507. doi: 10.1007/s10880-013-9370-3.
12. Golparvar M. Emotional Capital: Functions and Necessities. Tehran: Jangal Publishing; 2016.
13. Enayati M, Golparvar M. A structural model of the relationship between collective emotional investment, emotional capital, and psychosomatic complaints among nurses. Nursing Education. 2018;7(3):57–64.
14. Salehi-Mobarak A, Golparvar M, Yousefi Z. A comparison of the effectiveness of spiritual self-care training and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on emotional capital in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. 2024;1(4):68–84. doi: 10.61838/qecp.88.
15. Salehi Mobarakeh A, Golparvar M, Yousefi Z. Comparison of the effectiveness of spiritual self-care training and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on affective capital in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Quarterly of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. 2024;1(4):68–84. doi: 10.61838/qecp.88.
16. Rahnamayi S, Golparvar M, Aqaee A. A comparison of the effectiveness of the "Effective Mother-Adolescent Interaction" training package and emotion-regulation training on emotional capital in girls with externalizing behavioral problems. Ravish Psychology. 2024;13(1):83–92.
17. Salarfard M, Mahmoudinia M, Rahimi M, Roudsari RL. A systematic review of counselling approaches and their impact on marital intimacy among women and couples experiencing infertility. BMC Psychology. 2025;13(1):1089. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03430-4.
18. Yildiz Karaahmet A, Bilgiç FS, Yilmaz T, Shafaati Laleh S. The effects of cognitive interventions on quality of life in infertile women: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2025;46(1):2560828. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2025.2560828.
19. Jackson PL, Saunders P, Mizzi S, Hallam KT. The efficacy of psychological interventions for infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Women's Health. 2025;25(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-04054-x.
20. Masoumi SZ, Abdoli S, Kazemi F, Pilehvari S, Ahmadpanah M, Khodakarami B, et al. Stress management through cognitive reconstruction and positive thinking in women with recurrent failed in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2025;25(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06533-9.
21. Barlow DH, Farchione TJ, Fairholme CP, Ellard KK, Boisseau CL, Allen LB, et al. The unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders: Therapist guide. 2 ed: Oxford University Press; 2011.
22. Barlow DH, Farchione TJ, Sauer-Zavala S, Murray Latin H, Ellard KK, Bullis JR, et al. Unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders: Oxford University Press; 2021.
23. Masjedi Arani AM, Hosseini S, Lotfinia S, Ebrahimi LS, Mousavi SE, Mohammadzadeghan R, et al. The comparative efficacy of unified transdiagnostic protocol (UP) and mindfulness-based stress reduction protocol (MBSR) on emotion regulation and uncertainty intolerance in infertile women receiving IVF. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings. 2023;30(3):578–88. doi: 10.1007/s10880-022-09917-1.
24. Mousavi E, Hosseini S, Bakhtiyari M, Mohammadi A, Saberi Isfeedvajani M, Masjedi Arani A, et al. Comparing the effectiveness of the unified protocol transdiagnostic and mindfulness-based stress reduction program on anxiety and depression in infertile women receiving in vitro fertilisation. Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science. 2019;7(2):44–51.
25. Goodarzi M, Gholamrezaei S, Amraei K. The effectiveness of online unified transdiagnostic treatment on psychological distress, mindfulness, meta-emotion, and psychological strength in pregnant women. Cognitive Psychology and Psychiatry. 2021;8(1):88–105. doi: 10.32598/shenakht.8.1.88.
26. Timulak L, Dailey J, Lunn J, McKnight J. Transdiagnostic emotion-focused therapy for couples with co-morbid relational and mood, anxiety, and related difficulties. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy. 2025;55(1):1–10. doi: 10.1007/s10879-024-09645-7.
27. Mirkurbanova T. Effectiveness of existing methods for treating immunological infertility. Modern Science and Research. 2025;4(5):698–703.
28. Kianfar F, Bahner F, Sanaei-Manesh M. Psychometric evaluation of the Emotion Regulation Strategies Questionnaire and the Distress Tolerance Questionnaire among secondary school students. Applied Research in Counseling. 2023;6(20):33–53.
29. Sharma R, Biedenharn KR, Fedor JM, Agarwal A. Lifestyle factors and reproductive health: Taking control of your fertility. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2013;11(1):66. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-11-66.
30. Gall J, Borg W, Gall MD. Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods in Educational Sciences and Psychology. 9 ed. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press & SAMT; 2014.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sanaz Ahmadi (Author); Mohsen Golparvar; Zahra Yousefi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
